Právny obzor

4

Ročník 104

2021

 

 
T E O R E T I C K Ý  Č A S O P I S  P R E  O T Á Z K Y  Š T Á T U  A  P R Á V A

Spravodlivý trest

Just Punishment

Dr. h. c. prof. JUDr. Lucia K u r i l o v s k á, PhD., Institute of State and Law of Slovak Academy of Sciences
Plk. doc. Ing. Stanislav Š i š u l á k, PhD.
, Academy of the Police Force in Bratislava

Právny obzor, Volume 103, 2020, No. 4, pp. 281 – 296.

Published online: 31.8.2021

Abstract. Criminal justice always was and still is executed mainly by sentencing the perpetrator of criminal offense to a certain kind of punishment, which they are supposed to endure (suffer) as a cause for their criminal wrongdoings. We all know that such punishment has to be just, i. e. on a specific level appropriate to the offense in question. But this special quality of punishment did not always mean necessary the same thing indeed, it has varied greatly over historical evolution of criminal justice as such and was at every time closely tied with the general intended purpose of punishing. In the presented article, the authors look first at the main reasoning behind sentencing an offender to punishment and its overall ratio. Next, they briefly analyse the changes which the intended purpose of imposing a punishment undergone in terms of legal science and philosophy over previous centuries and the most notorious theories produced by this evolution. Secondly, the authors address the point of the concept of restorative justice in contrast to the concept of retributive justice, which both bear some significant traits of the main two separate theories on the purpose of punishment, as established previously. They argue that the current tendency of criminal politics to concentrate around undoing the wrong done by the crime, the supposed healing, restoration, changed greatly how we think about the justness of punishment. In this line of thought, they try to define just punishment as a core value of the concept of restorative justice. At last, in the third part of the presented article the authors try to sketch the basic rules of how we might determine that the punishment is just, so as to distinguish the way how the legal practitioners, mainly judges, should establish such punishment in terms of our legal heritage, culture and positive law.

Key words: just punishment, restorative justice, criminal justice, intended purpose of punishment

PDF DOWNLOAD

ISSN 2729-9228
(online)

ISSN 0032-6984
(print)

TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS PRE OTÁZKY ŠTÁTU A PRÁVA. VYDÁVA ÚSTAV ŠTÁTU A PRÁVA SLOVENSKEJ AKADÉMIE VIED

THEORETICAL REVIEW FOR ISSUES OF STATE AND LAW. PUBLISHED BY THE INSTITUTE OF STATE AND LAW OF THE SLOVAK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

REVUE THEORIQUE CONSACREE AUX QUESTIONS DE L´ÉTAT ET DU DROIT. PUBLIEE PAR L´INSTITUT DE L´ETAT ET DU DROIT DE L´ACADEMIE SLOVAQUE DES SCIENCES

THEORETISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR DIE FRAGEN ÜBER DEN STAAT UND RECHT. HERAUSGEGEBEN VON INSTITUT FÜR STAAT UND RECHTS DER SLOWAKISCHEN AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN

 

Redakcia | Editorial Office

Redakcia časopisu Právny obzor
Klemensova 19
813 64 Bratislava

Tel.: (+421) (2) 52 962 325
E-mail: usapvera@savba.sk
Web: www.usap.sav.sk

Vydavateľ | Publisher

Ústav štátu a práva SAV
Klemensova 19
813 64 Bratislava

Tel.: (+421) (2) 52 961 833
E-mail: usapsekr@savba.sk
Web: www.usap.sav.sk

Distribútor | Distributor

Wolters Kluwer s.r.o.
Mlynské Nivy 48
821 09 Bratislava

Tel.: (+421) 910 911 256
E-mail: kralovicova@wolterskluwer.sk
Web: www.wolterskluwer.sk

 
 

Copyright © 2000 - 2021 Ústav štátu a práva SAV | Ochrana osobných údajov | Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník - AKRONET