|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
 |
|
|
|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
|
|
|
|
Teoretické súvislosti právnej regulácie výkladu práva. Theoretical context of legal regulation of interpretation of law. JUDr. Eduard Bárány, DrSc., Ústav štátu a práva SAV, v. v. i., Bratislava Právny obzor, 107, 2024, No. 2, pp. 93 – 107. Published online: 20.10.2023 https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2024.2.01 Abstract. Legal regulation of interpretation of law (“law of interpretation”) is a strange part of legal order, and so even the confrontation of the law of interpretation with traditional parts and concepts of legal theory ensues in sometimes surprising results. Law of interpretation consists of secondary rules, but legal regulation of interpretation of law is not the regulation of some primary rules, but it regulates handling this rules by interpreters. It regulates the interpretation of specific normative texts. The position of interpreted law resembles the situation of the facts in standard legal regulation. Law of interpretation narrows the accepted possibilities of interpretation to support the regulative function of law. Interpretation and ensuing understanding of text are the field of hermeneutics. There are strong moments of circularity in law of interpretation and it resembles the theory of autopoietic systems. Authentic interpretation and legal definitions are separate problems of the law of interpretation. There is a tension between law of interpretation and the concept of separation of powers. Key words: interpretation, regulation, secondary rules, circularity, hermeneutics, authentic interpretation, legal definition
|
ISSN 2729-9228 ISSN 0032-6984
|
|
|
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ústav štátu a práva SAV. All rights reserved.Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník - AKRONET |
