|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
 |
|
|
|
| T E O R E T I C K Ý Č A S O P I S P R E O T Á Z K Y Š T Á T U A P R Á V A |
|
|
|
|
Opodstatnenie procesnej spravodlivosti Justification of procedural justice Doc. Mgr. Marek Káčer, PhD., Institute of State and Law of Slovak Academy of Sciences Právny obzor, 104, 2021, No. 5, pp. 333– 344 Published online: 2.11.2021 https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2021.5.01 Abstract. The fact of political and moral disagreement confirms that considerations of justice are often influenced by subjective preferences. However, the procedural concept of justice is to some extent immune to this subjectivism. Instead of a speculative question of what is just and unjust, proceduralism addresses the constructive question of how to establish legislative and judicial processes to maximize the chances of substantively just outcomes. This approach not only elaborates solid justification of a democratic rule of law; it also suggests a series of practical recommendations on how to improve the functioning of this form of government. Key words: democratic proceduralism, material and formal truth, ordeal (lex judicialis), constitutionality of the legislative process
|
ISSN 2729-9228 ISSN 0032-6984
|
|
|
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 Ústav štátu a práva SAV. All rights reserved.Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník - AKRONET |
