Najvyšší správny súd jako „new kid on the block“: komparativní pohled s českým Nejvyšším správním soudem.

Supreme Administrative Court as the “new kid on the block”: comparison with Czech Supreme Administrative Court.

Mgr. Šimon Chvojka, interný doktorandský student na Katedře ústavního práva a politologie Masarykovy Univerzity v Brně, odborný pracovník na Ústavu pro otázky soudnictví na téže fakultě a postgraduální student na Trinity College of Dublin.
V době přípravy tohoto článku pracoval také jako asistent soudce Nejvyššího správního soudu ČR. ORCID: 0000-0003-2326-7288

Právny obzor, 107, 2024, No. 2, pp. 170 – 191.

Published online: 20.10.2023

https://doi.org/10.31577/pravnyobzor.2024.2.06

Abstract. The paper presents the newly established Supreme Administrative Court of the Slovak Republic in comparison with its older counterpart in the Czech Republic by assessing the preference for a private or a public role. The paper begins by assessing the first instance agenda that both courts deal with. Thematically, the courts deal with the same agenda, but the difference lies in the scope of the agenda. The Slovak court’s jurisdiction to review local elections is more demanding due to the fragmentation of electoral districts. Moreover, it also has more disciplinary proceedings. This contributes to a higher workload for judges with a non-review agenda. An analysis of the procedural regulation of cassation complaint (an remedy against a decision of a lower administrative court) shows that the workload of the Slovak (and also the Czech, despite the existence of partial inadmissibility) court is subject to external influences, as the possibility of filing a cassation complaint is broad and the court has to decide on each of them on the merits, provided that the very basic formal requirements are met. Although its current caseload is manageable, this may not always be the case, as it is impossible for the court to control the number of cases that come before it and are decided.

Key words: Supreme Administrative Court, Slovakia, Czech Republic, cassation complaint, private and public role

ISSN 2729-9228
(online)

ISSN 0032-6984
(print)

TEORETICKÝ ČASOPIS PRE OTÁZKY ŠTÁTU A PRÁVA.

Právny obzor je recenzovaný časopis a je indexovaný v databázach SCOPUS a HeinOnline (INDEX TO FOREIGN LEGAL PERIODICALS)

Copyright © 2000 - 2023 Ústav štátu a práva SAV | Ochrana osobných údajov | Design by Mgr. Peter Krákorník - AKRONET